A Novel Technique for Basilar Invagination Treatment in a Patient with Klippel-Feil Syndrome: A Clinical Example and Brief Literature Review.

Objectives and Background: To present a novel technique of treatment for a patient with basilar invagination. Basilar invagination (BI) is a congenital condition that can compress the cervicomedullary junction, leading to neurological deficits. Severe cases require surgical intervention, but there is debate over the choice of approach. The anterior approach allows direct decompression but carries high complication rates, while the posterior approach provides indirect decompression and offers good stability with fewer complications. Materials and Methods: A 15-year-old boy with severe myelopathy presented to our hospital with neck pain, bilateral upper limb muscle weakness, and hand numbness persisting for 4 years. Additionally, he experienced increased numbness and gait disturbance three months before his visit. On examination, he exhibited hyperreflexia in both upper and lower limbs, muscle weakness in the bilateral upper limbs (MMT 4), bilateral hypoesthesia below the elbow and in both legs, mild urinary and bowel incontinence, and a spastic gait. Radiographs revealed severe basilar invagination (BI). Preoperative images showed severe BI and that the spinal cord was severely compressed with odontoid process. Results: The patient underwent posterior surgery with the C-arm free technique. All screws including occipital screws were inserted into the adequate position under navigation guidance. Reduction was achieved with skull rotation and distraction. A follow-up at one year showed the following results: Manual muscle testing results and sensory function tests showed almost full recovery, with bilateral arm recovery (MMT 5) and smooth walking. The cervical Japanese Orthopedic Association score of the patient improved from 9/17 to 16/17. Postoperative images showed excellent spinal cord decompression, and no major or severe complications had occurred. Conclusions: Basilar invagination alongside Klippel-Feil syndrome represents a relatively uncommon condition. Utilizing a posterior approach for treating reducible BI with a C-arm-free technique proved to be a safe method in addressing severe myelopathy. This novel navigation technique yields excellent outcomes for patients with BI.

Dysphagia as a primary manifestation of basilar impression: A case report.

Secondary basilar invagination or basilar impression is an anomaly at the craniovertebral junction where the odontoid process prolapses into the foramen magnum with the risk of compressing adjacent structures and obstructing the proper flow of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The incidence is less than 1% in the general population and occurs mainly in the first three decades of life when it is associated with malformations of the neuroaxis. In older age, the main aetiologies are diseases that alter bone mineral density. The clinical course is usually progressive and the most common symptoms are asthenia, cervical pain and restricted movement, but also dysphonia, dyspnoea and dysphagia. It is a progressive disease which, if left untreated, can cause severe neurological damage and death. We report the case of a 79-year-old woman with osteoporosis and progressive dysphagia leading to severe malnutrition, which conditioned the decision not to intervene due to the high perioperative risk.

C1–C2 intraarticular distraction with anterior cervical cages for basilar invagination realignment: Operative technique nuances and review of literature

Neurosurgical management of basilar invagination (BI) has traditionally been aimed at direct cervicomedullary decompression through transoral dens resection or suboccipital decompression with supplemental instrumented fixation. Dr. Goel introduced chronic atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) as the etiology in most cases of BI and described a technique for distracting the C1–C2 joint with interfacet spacers to achieve reduction and anatomic realignment. We present our modification to Goel’s surgical technique, in which we utilize anterior cervical discectomy (ACD) cages as C1–C2 interfacet implants. A young adult male presented to our institution with BI, cervicomedullary compression, occipitalization of C1, and Chiari 1 malformation. There was AAD of C1 over the C2 lateral masses. This reduced some with preoperative traction. He underwent successful C1–C2 interfacet joint reduction and arthrodesis with anterior cervical discectomy (ACD) cages and concomittant occiput to C2 instrumented fusion. BI can be effectively treated through reduction of AAD and by utilizing ACD cages as interfacet spacers. (AU)

El tratamiento neuroquirúrgico tradicional para la impresión basilar es principalmente a través de un abordaje trans-oral para la resección del proceso odontoide, seguido de una descompresión suboccipital con instrumentación posterior cervical. Dr. Goel presenta la dislocación atlanto-axial (AA) como una de las etiologías principales en los casos de impresión basilar. A su vez, describió la técnica quirúrgica que incluye la distracción de la articulación AA con cajas para fusión permitiendo la reducción y reajuste anatómico cervical. En este artículo presentamos una variación a la técnica quirúrgica del Dr. Goel en el cual utilizamos implantes utilizados en la discectomía y fusión cervical anterior (DFCA) para la articulación facetaria de C1–C2. Presentamos un paciente adulto masculino que evaluamos en nuestra institución con impresión basilar, compresión cérvico-medular, fusión occipital con el atlas y malformación de Chiari tipo 1. En adición, el paciente tenía evidencia radiográfica de dislocación AA. Se logro obtener reducción mínima de la impresión basilar con tracción cervical pre-operatoria. Luego, se sometió al tratamiento quirúrgico que consistió en el uso de implantes cervicales para la reducción y fusión de la articulación facetaria de C1–C2 complementado por instrumentación y fusión craneocervical. Esta técnica presentada sugiere que la reducción y reajuste anatómico cervical de la dislocación AA con implantes utilizados para DFCA puede ser efectivo para el tratamiento de impresión basilar. (AU)

A novel classification and management scheme for craniocervical junction disorders with ventral neural element compression.

OBJECTIVE: Craniocervical junction (CCJ) pathologies with ventral neural element compression are poorly understood, and appropriate management requires accurate understanding, description, and a more uniform nomenclature. The aim of this study was to evaluate patients to identify anatomical clusters and better classify CCJ disorders with ventral compression and guide treatment. METHODS: A retrospective review of adult and pediatric patients with ventral CCJ compression from 2008 to 2022 at a single center was performed. The incidence of anatomical abnormalities and compressive etiologies was assessed. Surgical approach, radiographic data, and outcomes were recorded. Association rules analysis (ARA) was used to assess variable clustering. RESULTS: Among 51 patients, the main causes of compression were either purely bony (retroflexed dens [n = 18]; basilar invagination [BI; n = 13]) or soft tissue (degenerative pannus [n = 16]; inflammatory pannus [n = 2]). The primary cluster in ARA was a retroflexed dens, platybasia, and Chiari malformation (CM), and the secondary cluster was BI, C1-2 subluxation, and reducibility. These, along with degenerative pannus, formed the three major classes. In assessing the optimal treatment strategy, reducibility was evaluated. Of the BI cases, 12 of the 13 patients had anterolisthesis of C1 that was potentially reducible, compared with 2 of the 18 patients with a retroflexed dens (both with concomitant BI), and no pannus cases. The mean C1-2 facet angle was significantly higher in BI at 32.4°, compared with -2.3° in retroflexed dens and 8.1° in degenerative pannus (p < 0.05). Endonasal decompression with posterior fixation was performed in 48 (94.0%) of the 51 patients, whereas posterior reduction/fixation alone was performed in 3 patients (6.0%). Of 16 reducible cases, open posterior reduction alone was successful in 3 (60.0%) of 5 cases, with all successes containing isolated BI. Reduction was not attempted if vertebral anatomy was unfavorable (n = 9) or the C1 lateral mass was absent (n = 5). The mean follow-up was 28 months. Symptoms improved in 88.9% of patients and were stable in the remaining 11.1%. Tracheostomy and percutaneous G-tube placement occurred in 7.8% and 11.8% of patients, respectively. Reoperation for an endonasal CSF leak repair or posterior cervical wound revision both occurred in 3.9% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: In classifying, one cluster caused decreased posterior fossa volume due to an anatomical triad of retroflexed dens, platybasia, and CM. The second cluster caused pannus formation due to degenerative hypertrophy. For both, endonasal decompression with posterior fixation was ideal. The third group contained C1 anterolisthesis characterized by a steep C1-2 facet angle causing reducible BI. Posterior reduction/fixation is the first-line treatment when anatomically feasible or endonasal decompression with in situ posterior fixation when anatomical constraints exist.

Cranio-cervical abnormalities in moderate-to-severe osteogenesis imperfecta - Genotypic and phenotypic determinants.

INTRODUCTION: Cranio-cervical anomalies are significant complications of osteogenesis imperfecta (OI), a rare bone fragility disorder that is usually caused by mutations in collagen type I encoding genes. OBJECTIVE: To assess cranio-cervical anomalies and associated clinical findings in patients with moderate-to-severe OI using 3D cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of CBCT scans in 52 individuals with OI (age 10-37 years; 32 females) and 40 healthy controls (age 10-32 years; 26 females). Individuals with a diagnosis of OI type III (severe, n = 11), type IV (moderate, n = 33) and non-collagen OI (n = 8) were recruited through the Brittle Bone Disorders Consortium. Controls were recruited through the orthodontic clinic of the University of Missouri-Kansas City (UMKC). RESULTS: OI and control groups were similar in mean age (OI: 18.4 [SD: 7.2] years, controls: 18.1 [SD: 6.3] years). The cranial base angle was increased in the OI group (OI: mean 148.6° [SD: 19.3], controls: mean 130.4° [SD: 5.7], P = .001), indicating a flatter cranial base. Protrusion of the odontoid process into the foramen magnum (n = 7, 14%) and abnormally located odontoid process (n = 19, 37%) were observed in the OI group but not in controls. Low stature, expressed as height z-score (P = .01), presence of DI (P = .04) and being male (P = .04) were strong predictors of platybasia, whereas height z-score (P = .049) alone was found as positive predictor for basilar impression as per the Chamberlain measurement. CONCLUSION: The severity of the phenotype in OI, as expressed by the height z-score, correlates with the severity of cranial base anomalies such as platybasia and basilar impression in moderate-to-severe OI. Screening for cranial base anomalies is advisable in individuals with moderate-to-severe OI, with special regards to the individuals with a shorter stature and DI.

The role of sphenoid bone in basilar invagination pathophysiology.

Basilar invagination (BI) is characterized by rostral dislocation of the cervical spine toward the skull base. The craniometrics of the skull base have shown significant differences among craniocervical junction malformations. The sphenoid bone is the center of the skull base; however, no study has evaluated this bone in cases of BI. This was a cross-sectional study of MRI databanks from two institutions of the author's practice between 1985 and 2020. The craniometrics of the sphenoid bone were measured in BI patients and controls. Fifty-eight MRIs were selected, including 28 BI patients and 30 controls. The mean sphenoid crest-clivus length was 32.66 ± 4.7 mm in the BI group and 29.98 ± 3.0 mm in the control group (p = 0.01). The mean sphenoid planum-top of Dorsum sellae length was 28.53 ± 3.7 mm in the BI group and 26.45 ± 3.2 mm in the control group (p = 0.02). The mean tuberculum sellae-sphenoid floor height was 18.52 ± 4.4 mm in the BI group and 21.32 ± 2.9 mm in the control group (p = 0.00). The mean sella turcica-sphenoid floor height was 10.35 ± 3.8 mm in the BI group and 12.24 ± 3.5 mm in the control group (p = 0.05). The mean clivus length was 29.81 ± 6.3 mm in the BI group and 40.86 ± 4.2 mm in the control group (p = 0.00). The mean sphenoid length was 58.34 ± 7.4 mm in the BI group and 67.31 ± 6.0 mm in the control group (p = 0.00). The mean sphenoid angle was 116.33 ± 8.7° in the BI group and 112.36 ± 6.9° in the control group (p = 0.05). The BI sphenoid bone has shorter vertical dimensions and longer horizontal measures. This morphology promotes a flattening of the sphenoid angle. The sphenoid bone is significantly altered in BI, favoring the congenital hypothesis in the pathophysiology of this disease.

Characteristics and evaluation of C1 posterior arch variation for transpedicular screw placement between patients with and without basilar invagination.

BACKGROUND: C1 transpedicular screw (C1TS) placement provided satisfactory pullout resistance and 3D stability, but its application might be limited in patients with basilar invagination (BI) due to the high incidences of the atlas anomaly and vertebral artery (VA) variation. However, no study has explored the classifications of C1 posterior arch variations and investigated their indications and ideal insertion trajectories for C1TS in BI. PURPOSE: To investigate the bony and surrounding arterial characteristics of the atlas, classify posterior arch variations, identify indications for C1TS, evaluate ideal insertion trajectories for C1TS in BI patients without atlas occipitalization (AO), and compare them with those without BI and AO as control. METHODS: A total of 130 non-AO patients with and without BI (52 patients and 78 patients, respectively) from two medical centers were included at a 1:1.5 ratio. The posterior arch variations were assessed using a modified C1 morphological classification. Comparisons regarding the bony and surrounding arterial characteristics, morphological classification distributions, and ideal insertion trajectories between BI and control groups were performed. The subgroup analyses based on different morphological classifications were also conducted. In addition, the factors possibly affecting the insertion parameters were investigated using multiple linear regression analyses. RESULTS: The BI group was associated with significantly smaller lateral mass height and width, sagittal length of posterior arch, pedicle height, vertical height of posterior arch, and distance between VA and VA groove (VAG) than control group. Four types of posterior arch variations with indications for different screw placement techniques were classified; Classifications I and II were suitable for C1TS. The BI cohort showed a significantly lower rate of Classification I than the control cohort. In the BI group, the subgroup of Classification I had significantly larger distance between the insertion point (IP) and inferior aspect of the posterior arch. In addition, it had the narrowest width along ideal screw trajectory, but a significantly more lateral ideal mediolateral angle than the subgroup of Classification II. Multiple linear regression indicated that the cephalad angle was significantly associated with the diagnosis of BI (B = 3.708, P < 0.001) and sagittal diameter of C1 (B = 3.417, P = 0.027); the ideal mediolateral angle was significantly associated with BMI (B = 0.264, P = 0.031), sagittal diameter of C1 (B = - 4.559, P = 0.002), and pedicle height (B = - 2.317, P < 0.001); the distance between the IP and inferior aspects of posterior arch was significantly associated with age (B = - 0.002, P = 0.035), BMI (B = - 0.007, P = 0.028), sagittal length of posterior arch (B = - 0.187, P = 0.032), pedicle height (B = - 0.392, P < 0.001), and middle and lower parts of posterior arch (B = 0.862, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The incidence of posterior arch variation in BI patients without AO was remarkably higher than that in control patients. The insertion parameters of posterior screws were different between the morphological classification types in BI and control groups. The distance between VA V3 segments and VAG in BI cohort was substantially smaller than that in control cohort. Preoperative individual 3D computed tomography (CT), CT angiography and intraoperative navigation are recommended for BI patients receiving posterior screw placement.

Anatomical Implications of Chiari I and Basilar Invagination (Type B) in the IV Ventricle and Cisterna Magna.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the anatomical changes of the IV ventricle and cisterna magna in the Chiari malformation I (CMI) and basilar invagination (type B). METHODS: This is a controlled study with 161 exams of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of adults grouped into control (n = 37), basilar invagination (BI; n = 31), Chiari malformation I (CMI; n = 37), and CMI+BI (n = 56). The MRIs were analyzed using the visualization software Osirix (Pixmeo, Bernex, Geneva, version 3.8.2). The morphometric variables were: distance from the obex to the McRae line; length of the IV ventricle floor; and the area and volume of the cisterna magna. The univariate ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-hoc test was applied to evaluate the difference between the groups. The difference between sexes was evaluated by the t test for each group. RESULTS: Alterations in the cisterna magna and IV ventricle were more evident only in the CMI and CMI+BI groups. For both sexes, the CMI and CMI+BI groups showed: a reduction in the CSF space (P < 0.001), cisterna magna with volume reduction (P < 0.001), low position of the obex (P < 0.001), and IV ventricle more elongated (male P = 0.007 and female P < 0.001). The BI group had no significant change in the analysis by sex. CONCLUSIONS: The CMI (isolated and associated with BI) showed a low obex position and elongation of the IV ventricle due to traction towards the spinal canal. The reduction of cisterna magna volume added to the occupation of the cerebellar tonsils can impact in the cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. The BI when isolated was not related to alterations in the parameters of cerebrospinal fluid spaces studied.

Modified interfacet technique using shaped autologous occipital bone mass for basilar invagination.

PURPOSE: In economically undeveloped areas, surgery for basilar invagination (BI) is still a serious economic burden for people. This study introduces a modified interfacet technique for the treatment of BI using shaped autologous occipital bone mass to reduce BI and to save economical expenditure. METHODS: The data of 6 patients with BI who underwent modified interfacet technique using shaped autologous occipital bone mass in our hospital from April 2020 to February 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. During the operation, osteotomy at the external occipital protuberance was performed using ultrasonic osteotome, followed by interfacet release and implantation of shaped autologous occipital bone mass to complete vertical reduction. The atlantodental interval (ADI), Chamberlain's line violation (CLV), clivo-axial angle (CXA) and cervico-medullary angle (CMA) were compared before and after surgery. Additionally, we observed implant stability during the follow-up period to assess the long-term success of the modified interfacet technique. RESULTS: The surgical procedure was successful in all six patients, with no reported incidents of vascular injury, spinal cord injury, or dural tear. Following the operation, improvements were observed in the ADI, CLV, CXA, and CMA. Throughout the follow-up period, the implants remained stable, demonstrating no complications such as bone resorption of the autologous occipital bone mass, implant fracture, or displacement. CONCLUSION: The utilization of shaped autologous occipital bone mass in atlantoaxial interfacet bone grafting has demonstrated effectiveness and feasibility. This technique offers simplicity, ease of preparation, and cost-effectiveness, making it a viable option for treating BI.

Individualized surgical treatment of Chiari 1 malformation: A single-center experience.

OBJECTIVE: To present our experience with an individualized surgical approach to treat Chiari malformation type 1. METHODS: Based on (1) neurological symptoms, (2) the existence and extent of a syrinx and (3) the degree of the tonsillar descent we performed four types of approaches on a case-by-case basis in 81 patients: (1) foramen magnum decompression (FMD) with dura splitting (FMDds); (2) FMD with duraplasty (FMDdp); (3) FMD with duraplasty and tonsillar manipulation (FMDao); and (4) tonsillar resection/reduction (TR). Patient characteristics, Chiari Severity Index (CSI), fourth ventricular roof angle (FVRA) and Chicago Chiari Outcome Scale (CCOS) were analyzed. RESULTS: CCOS was between 13 and 16 points in 8/11 (73 %) patients after FMDds, 38/45 (84 %) patients after FMDdp, and 24/24 (100 %, one patient lost to follow-up) patients after TR. We experienced an overall complication rate of 13.6 % (11/81) in this series, whereas seven of these eleven complications (64 %) occurred in the FMDao group and the complication rate increased with the invasiveness of the approach (0 % FMDds; 4 % FMDdp; 12 % TR). CONCLUSION: Given the clear correlation between the extend of the approach and the complication rate the least invasive approach necessary to achieve clinical improvement should be selected. Due to the high complication rates, FMDao should not be used as a treatment option. The severity of the tonsillar descent, basilar invagination and current CM1 scores could be used to aid in the approach selection.

Correlation Among Syrinx Resolution, Cervical Sagittal Realignment, and Surgical Outcome After Posterior Reduction for Basilar Invagination, Atlantoaxial Dislocation, and Syringomyelia.

BACKGROUND: The correlation among syrinx resolution, occipitoaxial sagittal alignment, and surgical outcome in long-term follow-up seems to have not been clarified. OBJECTIVE: To further explore the relationship between the syrinx resolution and occipitoaxial realignment after posterior reduction and fixation in basilar invagination (BI)-atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) patients with syringomyelia. METHODS: A continuous series of 32 patients with BI-AAD and syringomyelia who received direct posterior reduction met the inclusion criteria of this study. Their clinical and imaging data were analyzed retrospectively. Before surgery and at the last follow-up, we used the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and the Neck Disability Index (NDI) to assess the neurological status, respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficient and multiple stepwise regression analysis were used to explore the relevant factors that may affect surgical outcomes. RESULTS: There were significant differences in atlantodental interval, clivus-axial angle, occiput-C2 angle (Oc-C2A), cervicomedullary angle (CMA), subarachnoid space (SAS) at the foramen magnum (FM), syrinx size, NDI, and JOA score after surgery compared with those before surgery. ΔCMA and the resolution rate of syrinx/cord as relevant factors were correlated with the recovery rate of JOA (R 2 = 0.578, P < .001) and NDI (R 2 = 0.369, P < .01). What's more, ΔSAS/FMD (SAS/FM diameter) and ΔOc-C2A were positively correlated with the resolution rate of syrinx/cord (R 2 = 0.643, P < .001). CONCLUSION: With medulla decompression and occipital-cervical sagittal realignment after posterior reduction and fusion for BI-AAD patients with syringomyelia, the structural remodeling of the craniovertebral junction and occipitoaxial realignment could contribute to syringomyelia resolution.

C1-2 Fusion in Atlantoaxial Dislocation and Basilar Invagination with and without Chiari Malformation: Clinical/Radiological and Craniometric Results.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with Chiari malformation (CM) associated with atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) and basilar invagination (BI) may present with a small posterior cranial fossa, but data on the volumetric analysis are lacking. Additionally, whether additional foramen magnum decompression (FMD) is needed together with atlantoaxial fusion remains controversial. This study evaluated the volumetric alterations of the posterior cranial fossa in these patients and analyzed the radiological and clinical outcomes after posterior C1-C2 reduction and fixation plus C1 posterior arch resection. METHODS: Thirty-two adult CM patients with AAD and BI (CM-AAD/BI group) and 21 AAD and BI patients without CM (AAD/BI-only group) who received posterior atlantoaxial fusion plus C1 posterior arch resection were retrospectively studied. The clinical and radiological outcomes and volumetric measurements of the posterior cranial fossa were evaluated. RESULTS: The majority of CM-AAD/BI patients (94%) improved clinically and radiologically at 12 mo postoperatively, and none required additional FMD. Morphological analysis revealed a significant reduction in the bony posterior cranial fossa volumes of the CM-AAD/BI group (P < 0.01) and the AAD/BI-only group (P < 0.01) relative to those of the CM group. No significant differences were observed between the CM-AAD/BI and AAD/BI groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with patients with simple CM, patients with AAD/BI with or without CM demonstrated a considerably and equally reduced bony posterior cranial fossa volume. No additional FMD is needed in the treatment of CM-AAD/BI patients after posterior reduction and fusion plus C1 posterior arch resection.

Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions in the Management of Craniovertebral Junction Pathologies.

In this third article in a 3-article series on the craniocervical junction, we define the terms "basilar impression," "cranial settling," "basilar invagination," and "platybasia," noting that these terms are often used interchangeably but represent distinct entities. We then provide examples that represent these pathologies and treatment paradigms. Finally, we discuss the challenges and future direction in the craniovertebral junction surgery space.

Interfacet Distraction for Type B-Basilar Invagination Assisted by a Novel Sliding-Traction Head Holder: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.

Type B basilar invagination (BI) refers to odontoid process prolapse into skull base without dislocation, which is often associated with Chiari malformation and syringomyelia.1 Its pathogenesis and treatment are in controversy. Posterior fossa decompression has been introduced to treat the associated Chiari malformation; however, it may not be effective for symptoms with severe ventral nerve compression.2 C1-2 in situ fixation has been reported to treat minor instability in type B BI,3 yet the assessment of minor instability has not been widely accepted. We believe that the pathogenesis is chronic ventral compression of the brainstem. Transoral odontoidectomy is a classic surgical procedure to treat the pathogenesis, but it is associated with high risks of infection, velopharyngeal incompetence, and airway obstruction and often requires posterior surgery for fusion.4 Thus we use an interfacet distraction technique to move the odontoid process down and relieve ventral brainstem compression.5 Therefore interfacet structural support is necessary to maintain the distance of the interfacet. The reason for fixation is that interfacet distraction disrupts atlantoaxial stability. We designed a novel sliding-traction head holder, which can quantitatively tract and stabilize the head without support for the head or face, avoiding the risk of eyeball compression. It adapts to a variety of surgical methods and allows intraoperative changes in the patient's position. Assisted by the device, a satisfied interfacet distraction and a correction of BI were obtained. Video 1 describes how the interfacet distraction technique assisted by a sliding-traction head holder was performed in an illustrative case. The patient consented to the procedure.

Chamberlain's Line Violation in Basilar Invagination Patients Compared with Normal Subjects: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the measured odontoid tip violation above Chamberlain's line described in the literature to diagnose basilar invagination (BI) and to establish the normal placement of the dens tip defining individuals without BI (normal subjects). METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed to identify clinical or radiological studies that expressed the amount of odontoid violation above Chamberlain's line in patients with a BI diagnosis. In addition, a meta-analysis was performed to evaluate normal subjects' values of Chamberlain's line violation (CLV). RESULTS: There were 23 studies included (13 radiological and 10 clinical). Most studies used computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging. Eight different cutoff values were used to measure dislocated odontoid apexes above Chamberlain's line regardless of the radiological modality. The mean measured amount of CLV was 3.95 mm (median 5 mm; range, 0-9 mm). The meta-analysis included 8 studies (1233 patients) with a normal sample population with a mean normal CLV of -0.63 mm (below the line) (95% confidence interval [-0.8, 1.18 mm], random effects model). CONCLUSIONS: Different values were found in the assessed studies used for CLV in BI diagnosis. This variability is especially important for type B BI, as type A BI has other craniocervical diagnostic parameters. Considering the results obtained in this meta-analysis, BI should be diagnosed in the case of any dens violation >1.18 mm.

Atlas invagination through the foramen magnum: expanding the spectrum of craniovertebral junction malformations.

PURPOSE: Malformations of the craniovertebral junction (CVJ) range from mild, asymptomatic conditions to severe forms of instability with basilar invagination. Rarely, there have been accounts of forms of so-called paramedian basilar invagination, with abnormal bone masses invading the lateral portion of the foramen magnum. All these entities have been comprehensively classified both from an anatomical and embryological standpoint. METHODS: Here, we report a case of a unique CVJ malformation which is not included in any existing classification framework and could represent a novel pathologic entity. We also provide an overview of the pertinent literature. RESULTS: The patient was a 14-year-old boy with a recent onset of spastic tetraparesis. Radiological studies documented a malformation of the atlas which invaginated through the foramen magnum, causing anterolateral medullary incarceration. Surgical treatment involved posterior decompression with resection of the abnormal bone and occipito-cervical fusion. CONCLUSION: Our report enriches the panorama of CVJ malformations, showing how anatomical knowledge and embryological insights constitute the basis for the correct assessment and treatment of these complex entities.